.svg)
Absolutely. RankWit supports multi-website and multi-brand tracking:
This makes RankWit ideal for agencies, SEO teams, or businesses managing multiple properties in one centralized dashboard.
RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) is a cutting-edge AI technique that enhances traditional language models by integrating an external search or knowledge retrieval system. Instead of relying solely on pre-trained data, a RAG-enabled model can search a database or knowledge source in real time and use the results to generate more accurate, contextually relevant answers.
For GEO, this is a game changer.
GEO doesn't just respond with generic language—it retrieves fresh, relevant insights from your company’s knowledge base, documents, or external web content before generating its reply. This means:
By combining the strengths of generation and retrieval, RAG ensures GEO doesn't just sound smart—it is smart, aligned with your source of truth.
At Rankwit, we specialize in helping merchants take advantage of OpenAI’s Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP).
Our team manages the entire integration lifecycle, from mapping your product catalog to OpenAI’s structured feed specification, to building the checkout API endpoints and connecting secure payment providers like Stripe.
By partnering with Rankwit, your business can:
We tailor solutions to both enterprise and custom e-commerce platforms, ensuring a scalable and future-ready architecture.
GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is not a rebrand of SEO—it’s a response to an entirely new environment. SEO optimizes for bots that crawl, index, and rank. GEO optimizes for large language models (LLMs) that read, learn, and generate human-like answers.
While SEO is built around keywords and backlinks, GEO is about semantic clarity, contextual authority, and conversational structuring. You're not trying to please an algorithm—you’re helping an AI understand and echo your ideas accurately in its responses. It's not just about being found—it's about being spoken for.
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is becoming increasingly critical as user behavior shifts toward AI-native search tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity.
According with Bain, recent data shows that over 40% of users now prefer AI-generated answers over traditional search engine results.
This trend reflects a major evolution in how people discover and consume information.
Unlike traditional SEO, which focuses on ranking in static search results, GEO ensures that your content is understandable, relevant, and authoritative enough to be cited or surfaced in LLM-generated responses.
This is especially important as AI platforms begin to integrate live web search capabilities, summaries, and citations directly into their answers.
The urgency is amplified by user traffic trends. According to Similarweb data (see chart below), ChatGPT visits are projected to surpass Google’s by December 2026 if current growth continues.
This suggests that visibility in LLMs may soon be as important—if not more—than traditional search rankings.
As businesses and content creators begin adapting to Generative Engine Optimization, it's crucial to recognize that strategies effective in traditional SEO don’t always translate to success with AI-driven search models like ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity.
In fact, certain classic SEO practices can actually reduce your visibility in AI-generated answers.
In traditional SEO, the use of targeted keywords, often repeated strategically across headers, metadata, and body content, is a foundational tactic.
This approach helps search engine crawlers associate pages with specific queries, and has long been used to improve rankings on platforms like Google and Bing.
However, in the context of GEO, keyword stuffing and rigid repetition can backfire. indeed, Large Language Models (LLMs) are not keyword matchers, but they are pattern recognizers that prioritize natural, contextual, and semantically rich language.
When content is overly optimized and lacks a conversational or human tone, it becomes less appealing for AI models to cite or summarize.
Worse, it may signal to the model that the content is promotional or unnatural, leading to it being deprioritized in AI-generated responses.
ℹ️ Best Practice: Instead of focusing on exact-match keywords, create content that mirrors how real users ask questions. Use plain, fluent language and focus on fully answering likely user intents in a natural tone.
Moreover, while E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trustworthiness) has gained importance in SEO, it’s often still possible to rank SEO pages with minimal authority if technical and content signals are strong. This is less true in GEO.
LLMs are trained to surface and reference content that demonstrates a high degree of trustworthiness. They favor sources that reflect real-world experience, subject-matter expertise, and institutional authority. Content without clear authorship, lacking credentials, or failing to convey reliability may be ignored by LLMs, even if it’s optimized in other ways.
ℹ️ Best Practice: Build content that clearly communicates why your organization or author is credible. Include bios, cite credentials, and demonstrate hands-on knowledge. For health, finance, or scientific topics, link to institutional or peer-reviewed sources to reinforce authority.
In addition, in traditional SEO, especially in long-tail keyword spaces, some websites can rank with minimal sourcing or citations, particularly when competing against weak content. However, GEO demands higher factual rigor.
LLMs are designed to summarize and synthesize trusted data. They tend to skip over content that lacks citation, includes speculative claims, or refers to ambiguous sources.
Moreover, AI models have been trained on vast amounts of data from academic, journalistic, and institutional sources. This training impacts which sites and sources the models tend to favor when generating answers. Content without strong sourcing is less likely to be cited or retrieved via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) processes.
ℹ️ Best Practice: Always back your claims with authoritative, up-to-date sources. Link to original studies, well-known publications, or government and academic institutions. Inline citations and linked references increase your content’s reliability from an LLM’s perspective.
In short, while there is some overlap between SEO and GEO, optimizing for AI models requires a distinct strategy. The focus shifts from gaming algorithmic ranking systems to ensuring clarity, credibility, and accessibility for intelligent systems that mimic human understanding. To succeed in GEO, it's not enough to be visible to search engines—you must also be comprehensible, trustworthy, and useful to AI.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data, from websites to books, to understand and generate language.
They use deep learning algorithms, specifically transformer architectures, to model the structure and meaning of language.
LLMs don't "know" facts in the way humans do. Instead, they predict the next word in a sequence using probabilities, based on the context of everything that came before it. This ability enables them to produce fluent and relevant responses across countless topics.
For a deeper look at the mechanics, check out our full blog post: How Large Language Models Work.
Implementing WebMCP is streamlined through the Google Chrome Labs toolkit. Developers have two primary paths:
toolname and tooldescription attributes to existing HTML <form> tags.navigator.modelContext.registerTool() API to expose complex JavaScript functions as callable AI tools.This flexibility allows teams to start with basic functionality and scale to complex integrations without a total architecture overhaul.
AI Search Optimization refers to the practice of structuring, formatting, and presenting digital content to ensure it is surfaced by AI systems—particularly large language models (LLMs)—in response to user queries.Choosing a clear, unified name for this emerging field is crucial because it shapes professional standards, guides tool development, informs marketing strategies, and fosters a cohesive community of practice. Without a consistent term, the industry risks fragmentation and inefficiency, much like early digital marketing faced before "SEO" was widely adopted.
Traditional LLMs are limited by their training data "cutoff" dates. WebMCP bridges this gap by enabling Dynamic Context Injection:
