.svg)
RankWit analyzes your existing content and gives actionable, data-backed recommendations for improving your AI visibility. Suggestions include:
Security is baked into the protocol's core. Unlike "headless" automation, WebMCP operates within the user’s current browser session:
webmcp-tools suite.
At Rankwit, we specialize in helping merchants take advantage of OpenAI’s Agentic Commerce Protocol (ACP).
Our team manages the entire integration lifecycle, from mapping your product catalog to OpenAI’s structured feed specification, to building the checkout API endpoints and connecting secure payment providers like Stripe.
By partnering with Rankwit, your business can:
We tailor solutions to both enterprise and custom e-commerce platforms, ensuring a scalable and future-ready architecture.
Absolutely. RankWit supports multi-website and multi-brand tracking:
This makes RankWit ideal for agencies, SEO teams, or businesses managing multiple properties in one centralized dashboard.
Traditional LLMs are limited by their training data "cutoff" dates. WebMCP bridges this gap by enabling Dynamic Context Injection:
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) and Answer Engine Optimization (AEO) are closely related strategies, but they serve different purposes in how content is discovered and used by AI technologies.
llms.txt) to guide how AI systems interpret and prioritize your content.In short:
AEO helps you be the answer in AI search results. GEO helps you be the source that generative AI platforms trust and cite.
Together, these strategies are essential for maximizing visibility in an AI-first search landscape.
As businesses and content creators begin adapting to Generative Engine Optimization, it's crucial to recognize that strategies effective in traditional SEO don’t always translate to success with AI-driven search models like ChatGPT, Gemini, or Perplexity.
In fact, certain classic SEO practices can actually reduce your visibility in AI-generated answers.
In traditional SEO, the use of targeted keywords, often repeated strategically across headers, metadata, and body content, is a foundational tactic.
This approach helps search engine crawlers associate pages with specific queries, and has long been used to improve rankings on platforms like Google and Bing.
However, in the context of GEO, keyword stuffing and rigid repetition can backfire. indeed, Large Language Models (LLMs) are not keyword matchers, but they are pattern recognizers that prioritize natural, contextual, and semantically rich language.
When content is overly optimized and lacks a conversational or human tone, it becomes less appealing for AI models to cite or summarize.
Worse, it may signal to the model that the content is promotional or unnatural, leading to it being deprioritized in AI-generated responses.
ℹ️ Best Practice: Instead of focusing on exact-match keywords, create content that mirrors how real users ask questions. Use plain, fluent language and focus on fully answering likely user intents in a natural tone.
Moreover, while E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authority, Trustworthiness) has gained importance in SEO, it’s often still possible to rank SEO pages with minimal authority if technical and content signals are strong. This is less true in GEO.
LLMs are trained to surface and reference content that demonstrates a high degree of trustworthiness. They favor sources that reflect real-world experience, subject-matter expertise, and institutional authority. Content without clear authorship, lacking credentials, or failing to convey reliability may be ignored by LLMs, even if it’s optimized in other ways.
ℹ️ Best Practice: Build content that clearly communicates why your organization or author is credible. Include bios, cite credentials, and demonstrate hands-on knowledge. For health, finance, or scientific topics, link to institutional or peer-reviewed sources to reinforce authority.
In addition, in traditional SEO, especially in long-tail keyword spaces, some websites can rank with minimal sourcing or citations, particularly when competing against weak content. However, GEO demands higher factual rigor.
LLMs are designed to summarize and synthesize trusted data. They tend to skip over content that lacks citation, includes speculative claims, or refers to ambiguous sources.
Moreover, AI models have been trained on vast amounts of data from academic, journalistic, and institutional sources. This training impacts which sites and sources the models tend to favor when generating answers. Content without strong sourcing is less likely to be cited or retrieved via Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) processes.
ℹ️ Best Practice: Always back your claims with authoritative, up-to-date sources. Link to original studies, well-known publications, or government and academic institutions. Inline citations and linked references increase your content’s reliability from an LLM’s perspective.
In short, while there is some overlap between SEO and GEO, optimizing for AI models requires a distinct strategy. The focus shifts from gaming algorithmic ranking systems to ensuring clarity, credibility, and accessibility for intelligent systems that mimic human understanding. To succeed in GEO, it's not enough to be visible to search engines—you must also be comprehensible, trustworthy, and useful to AI.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data, from websites to books, to understand and generate language.
They use deep learning algorithms, specifically transformer architectures, to model the structure and meaning of language.
LLMs don't "know" facts in the way humans do. Instead, they predict the next word in a sequence using probabilities, based on the context of everything that came before it. This ability enables them to produce fluent and relevant responses across countless topics.
For a deeper look at the mechanics, check out our full blog post: How Large Language Models Work.
RankWit plans are designed to scale with your needs:
If you’re unsure, we can help you select the best plan based on your tracking volume and team size.
Agentic RAG represents a new paradigm in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG).
While traditional RAG retrieves information to improve the accuracy of model outputs, Agentic RAG goes a step further by integrating autonomous agents that can plan, reason, and act across multi-step workflows.
This approach allows systems to:
In other words, Agentic RAG doesn’t just provide better answers, but it strategically manages the retrieval process to support more accurate, efficient, and explainable decision-making.
